 |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Articles about Misunderstanding |
| The trade show unfortunate misunderstanding | | 2008-02-20 11:13:36 | | Last week the blog was fairly inactive as I went to London to attend the 2008 International Confex.
For those out there who don’t know what I am talking about, Confex is one of the biggest trade shows for event planners, mangers and everyone involved into the industry.
This is the trade show of the trade shows. [...]... | | By: Event Management | | |
| | Misunderstanding Tom F. - Who Pays for Special Ed for Private School Students | | 2007-12-02 12:22:00 | | There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about the meaning of the recent Tom F. decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. I have talked to a lot of people who feel that the Second Circuit decision, which was affirmed by default, for the Second Circuit only, by the tie vote by the Supremes, requires public school districts to reimburse tuition for many or all private school students. These folks are overlooking one important factor; before tuition may be reimbursed, the parent/student must prove a denial of FAPE. In other words, the school district must either prevent the parents from meaningful participation in the process or else write an IEP that is reasonably calculated to confer no more than trivial educational benefit to the child.Where a child is denied FAPE, the parents must choose between keeping the child in the public school and seeking remedies such as compensatory education and withdrawing the student and placing him in a private school while seeking reimbursement as the primary remedy. Tom F, and Frank G were rare cases in which the student was never actually enrolled in public school. In both cases, however, the parents requested that the district prepare an IEP and in both cases, hearing officers and state review officers found a denial of FAPE. Frank G and Diane G ex rel Anthony G v. Bd of Educ of Hyde Park 459 F.3d 356, 46 IDELR 33 (2d Cir. 2006); Bd ofEduc of the City School District of New York v. Tom F ex rel Gilbert F 42 IDELR 171 (SD NY 2005). This is an important precondition to reimbursementI believe that the reaction to Tom F is at least partly colored by the attitude of the federal government lately which seems to many to be that the public schools are the pollution and that private schools are the solution. Given that attitude of Congress, as evidenced by both NCLB and the 2004 reauthorization, and that attitude of OSEP, as reflected in the 2006 regulations, it is easy to understand why public school officials view the decision by the high c... | | By: Special education Law | | |
| |
|
|
| To clearify a common misunderstanding | | 2006-08-11 07:56:48 | | I want to make a quick post about the history of this software program.For a long time ago when I was searching on the net trying to find out where to buy Painter, I ran into a little problem. A common misunderstanding that many have. And that is: What is the difference between the program called Procreate Painter and Corel Painter? The answer is : NONE. Procreate IS Painter, the thing is that Painter was temporarily rebranded Procreate Painter during its transition into the Corel Suite of applications. But that time is over now, and the program is just know for Corel Painter, or just Painter among the advanced users. In addition it can be mentioned here, that in 2005 Corel released "scaled-down version of Painter developed for home users" called Painter Essentials 3.... | | By: Corel Painter Resource blog | | |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
| |
|
 |
