 |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Articles about Validity |
| Prevailing wage can be filed even after validity period | | 2008-07-14 09:52:18 | | It is clearly mentioned that we can submit <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />PERM application after the validity period of the prevailing wage determination only if we had begun the recruitment process during the validity period.<?xml:namespace prefix = o /> Does a prevailing wage determination expire? http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/perm_faqs_3-3-05.pdf Yes, a prevailing wage | | By: Partha On Immigration | | |
| | Area of Validity Bills of Material Guide | | 2008-03-23 12:00:10 | | Material BOMs can be valid on different organizational levels:You can use a material BOM to manage data that applies directly to production. This is why the area of validity is the plant. The plant is the location where all necessary work-scheduling procedures are organized, such as MRP and creating routings.In this case, you create a plant-specific BOM.However, you can also create a group BOM, without reference to a plant. For example, a designer maintains a group BOM during the design phase of a product, then the BOM is allocated to one or more plants for production purposes. You can extend the area of validity of a BOM by allocating the same BOM to a material in different plants. Group BOM If you create a material BOM without reference to a plant, the BOM is valid throughout your company. To do this, you leave the Plant field blank. The system checks whether material masters exist. There are no system checks for plant data. Plant-Specific Material BOM If you create a mat | | By: Free Download SAP PP Books And Interview Questions | | |
| | Validity Period Bills of Material Guide | | 2008-03-23 11:58:48 | | In the standard system, the effectivity of a BOM header or BOM item is defined by time, using the Valid-from date. For example, a BOM has 4 items instead of 3 as of December 12, 1999. The validity period is the time during which the BOM header or BOM item is valid. This period is delimited by the following data in the BOM header and BOM item:Valid-from date When you create a BOM, this date determines the point in time at which this BOM becomes effective.If you create or change a BOM using a change number, the system takes the valid-from date from the change master record. Valid-to date This date determines the end of the validity period of the BOM. The system default is December 31, 9999. If you change a BOM using a change number, the system determines the valid-to date dynamically.If you change a BOM using a change number with a valid-from date, the pre-change validity period of the BOM header or BOM item ends at exactly 00.00 hours on this valid-from date. If you change a BOM h | | By: Free Download SAP PP Books And Interview Questions | | |
|
|
|
| PwC and Yukos - Additional validity for the Russian prosecutors or not? | | 2007-06-26 08:30:53 | | In an unprecedented move for worldwide assurance practice PricewaterhoueCoopers (PwC) withdrew 10 years worth of audit opinions regarding the now bankrupt Yukos oil company. PwC said yesterday it suspects that former Yukos management may have provided inaccurate information to its auditors, and thus Yukos's financial reports certified by PwC for the years 1995-2004 should no longer be relied upon.The reason for the withdrawal of opinion according to PwC was the existence of intercompany and arm's length transactions between Yukos and its subsidiaries which were never properly classified and which were an inseparable component of its money-laundering scheme. As the Financial Times reports:“Company management many times declared to us that [the companies]… were not related parties,” the letter says, a copy of which was first obtained by Russian newspaper Vedomosti. During a criminal investigation by prosecutors into the company “we received information that showed [these companies] were controlled by the shareholders of Group Menatep Limited and were used to their advantage,”it says. Baltic Petroleum, South Petroleum and Behles traded Yukos oil from 1995 to 1999. Group Menatep is Yukos’s majority shareholder.PwC also said management failed to provide enough information on whether Russian entities later used by Yukos were arm’s length transactions or not, and also failed to disclose enough information on “significant payments” the company paid to entities owned by the shareholders of Menatep Bank, which went bust in the August 1998 financial crisis. PwC previously said it stood by its audits of Yukos and its internal trading structures, which the letter appears to refer to.Such an issue has a multitude of repercussions both for the future of the Yukos affair and for the future of PwC. Withdrawing 10 years worth of audit work has not been done in the case of billion dollar corporations. Even the infamous Arthur Andersen did not withdraw its audit wor | | By: Russia\\\'s True Tales of Terra | | |
| | Validity of Murphy predator stings under scrutiny | | 2007-05-09 06:08:21 | | Validity of Murphy predator stings under scrutiny
By BYRON HARRIS / WFAA-TV
The town of Murphy in Collin County became big news last fall after it was the location for a highly publicized sting designed to catch sexual predators, which became the subject of two NBC To Catch a Predator shows. The sting was also behind the suicide of an assistant Kaufman County district attorney.
However, information has arisen that indicates that after the television crews left, little happened to the alleged sexual predators.
While there were 24 arrests, not one case has gone to court. Reports also reveal that the legality of the sting was questioned before it went down, and that a key search warrant was invalid.
The news has led critics, inside and outside the legal system, to ask whether the sting was about law enforcement or making a TV show.
Full Story Here:
Validity of Murphy predator stings under scrutiny
This sting went down in November of last year and many of you may remember it for the natio | | By: TexasFred's | | |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
| |
|
 |
